Sometimes you just need to look at the beauty in the world. I'm stuck in Houston at the moment with all the Republican presidential candidates swarming into town so for a little break, I decided to get out of my head a bit and enjoy this 4K thrill ride that is a hyper-lapse of Paris. Shot by Tyler Fairbank using a bevy of lenses on his Sony A7s, the hyper-lapse is lush and, at only two minutes, a quick escape from the office and politics that are palpable in the air today.
Enjoy.
Last Sunday we spent the entire day taking my in-laws on a scavenger hunt through San Antonio. From eating at the spot where they got engaged to watching "A Charlie Brown Christmas" at the children's theater that my wife performed at when she was little, it was a walk down memory lane. There were no tacky Christmas ties or small kitchen utensils that would probably go unused, just a family spending the day reminding themselves of some of the great times they've had together. It was beautiful.
Co.Exist writer Jay Cassano took a look at this idea of experiences over things in his article "The Science Of Why You Should Spend Your Money On Experiences, Not Things," published earlier in 2015. For the article, Cassano interviewed Dr. Thomas Gilovich, a psychology professor at Cornell University who has spent the better part of two decades looking at the connection between money and happiness. The interesting thing that I picked up on is that money can actually make you happy, but the feeling that it leaves us with is usually short-lived. "We buy things to make us happy, and we succeed," said Gilovich. "But only for a while. New things are exciting to us at first, but then we adapt to them."
I really like to play video games. It's relaxing to me, although my wife may not agree, and I usually spend a short time after work playing to help wind down from the office and switch into home mode. The problem is that there's always a new game that comes along and offers a new experience, and usually comes with a $60-70 price tag. I kid myself into thinking it's an immersive experience and helps with my hand-eye coordination but in reality I'm just sitting on my couch while my wife colors next to me with only a few words said between us. That's not experience, just distraction.
Me in Paris at one of my favorite spots, Fontaine Saint-Michel, on our honeymoon in 2015.
I'll also be the first to admit that I'm really bad about spending money on things instead of experiences. I love to travel and will jump at the chance to go anywhere new, but find that if I just saved some of my money for such things instead of buying the latest Star Wars game, which was a bit of a let down anyways, it'd be a hell of a lot easier to afford some great weekend trips.
"Our experiences are a bigger part of ourselves than our material goods," says Gilovich. "You can really like your material stuff. You can even think that part of your identity is connected to those things, but nonetheless they remain separate from you. In contrast, your experiences really are part of you. We are the sum total of our experiences."
My MacBook Pro can't recreate the experience of sitting along the Seine on a cold day and feeling the river lap against the concrete of Pont Neuf. That's poetry, words and wind mixing together to create a timeless experience that imprints itself onto your consciousness. You don't normally hear much poetry written about gaining the high score on Halo or Black Ops 3. I'm sure it exists, it's just probably not very inspiring.
"Turns out people don't like hearing about other people's possessions very much," Cornell doctoral candidate Amit Kumar said while speaking to The Atlantic in 2014, "but they do like hearing about that time you saw Vampire Weekend."
At the end of Cassano's article, Gilovich talks about how we as a society should put more emphasis on experiences, noting that currently it's much easier to just purchase things. "By shifting the investments that societies make and the policies they pursue, they can steer large populations to the kinds of experiential pursuits that promote greater happiness," write Gilovich and coauthor, Kumar, in their recent article in the academic journal Experimental Social Psychology.
This is an approach that I'm all for. Gilovich even goes as far as positing that our priorities are skewed and that we should be making it easier to have these experiences, including more paid leave from work and better recreational spaces to have them in. What good is a public park if it's not kept up or safe? We owe it to ourselves to care about the places we live so we can experience beautiful things in them.
So as 2016 looms large and heavy upon us, I'm committing to spend less money on stuff that usually breaks and lets you down and more on living life with my family and friends. Besides, you have more to write about that way.
P.S. I'm not against video games at all, I just personally need to play them less and spend more time being creative for my own personal sanity.
Todays post comes from my good friend Katie Metzger, co-founder and creative director of Same Thread.
What we wear tells a story of who we are and what we value. It is a powerful expression of self-identity that is often one of the first things that others take notice of. We communicate a story without words through these mundane, everyday choices.
Look at the clothes you are wearing right now….What story do they tell about you? We often strive to construct an image through clothing to expresses internal qualities such as creativity, free spiritedness or minimalism. But how often do we use clothing to express our values of sustainability, social justice or empowerment?
In our increasing fast-moving world, clothing construction and fashion have become less of an art of self-expression and more of a disposable commodity. On our backs one day, in the trash the next. The explosion of “fast fashion” in recent decades has proved to be disastrous both environmentally and economically for garment workers and their communities worldwide. Would you believe that 80-90% of what you are wearing was made in inhumane, unsustainable conditions? The hard truth this is most often the case. Sweatshops are not a thing of the past and expensive or high-end clothing is not exempt to this problem.
This is hard to swallow, and as someone who loves fashion and also strives to be an advocate for social justice, it can seem too overwhelming to even think about. However, information and acknowledgement is where change begins. So why should you give a damn about where your clothing comes from and what can you, practically, do?
When discussing the issue of ethicality in the clothing industry, one may have images of sweatshops and child laborers in developing nations toiling all day in inhumane conditions. Although this image may seem extreme, it is a very real aspect of our current garment and fashion industry practices worldwide. Sweatshops from Bangladesh to Cambodia to Mexico routinely pay their workers less than $1.20 per day for their work. This is not a living wage, even in the most poverty-stricken communities. The chronic underpayment of garment industry workers creates a cycle of poverty in already struggling communities, in turn contributing to other social issues resulting from poverty such as lack of access to education, health problems, and sex work. Not to mention the environmental toll that fast fashion takes on the communities in which they are made. Sweatshops are not only present in developing nations but are also a growing problem in the United States.
According to the U.S. Department of Labor, in recent years roughly 11,000 U.S. based factories were cited as violating workers’ rights and not paying laborers a minimum wage. This shows the problem of human rights violations in textile and garment factories is not only an international problem but a domestic problem as well. Additionally, many companies touted as being ethically made have had numerous sweatshop scandals. When it comes to clothing ethicality we must learn to be active, not passive, consumers of information.
Recently a study was conducted by the American Sociological Association regarding the marketability of fair trade products; this study found that an overwhelming majority of consumers would pay $1-$5 more for items they know are made in an ethical way. Although large strides towards ethical production have been made in the coffee, chocolate and food industry, the clothing industry remains hugely underserved.
You may say “Well, now I’m thoroughly depressed… What can I actually do without having to trade in all my favorite items for hemp, organic, recycled burlap sack crap?” All change starts with small steps. Here are some suggestions for leaning into change when it comes to fashion:
Due to the lack of choice in the ethical clothing market, I was inspired to create and launch an ethically made, eco-friendly women’s clothing company that works to economically empower women. Same Thread works with women in NE Thailand providing job skills training and stable employment in an effort to combat the prevalence of sex work through prevention. For more information visit us at Samethread.com.
Informing ourselves and leaning into change is the first step to breaking our collective addiction to fast fashion. Join me in working to bring ethical progress to the fashion industry.
Katie is a native Pacific Northwesterner with a passion for social justice and bringing fair trade businesses practices into the mainstream. In 2014 she completed her MA in International Development, where she focused on social enterprise and its capacity to economically empower women. On a typical Saturday she can be found cooking, sewing, drawing, listening to records, vintage shopping, sipping whiskey and playing with her puppies at her home in Seattle.
There's something stark about Soviet design and propaganda art. The harsh lines. Limited colors. Lenin lurking ominously in the background. There's also something very intriguing in it. Those same harsh lines speak of a reality that I have no experience in. They draw me in to a world that still exists, just in a different fashion. Sure the fall of the U.S.S.R in 1989-90 put an end to a lot of the feelings that Westerners had about the Russian motherland but a lot of the harsh lines in those posters from the late 1910's to early 1970's still hold significance.
I'm a big fan of Wassily Kandinsky and his geometric style of modern art. My favorite Kandinksy work is his Yellow – red – blue (1925) that ultimately broke with the constructivism and suprematism that came to be the hallmark of Soviet propaganda posters, showcasing freedom from organization and order. It was his own way of rebelling against the revolution occurring around him in his homeland, shortly before moving to Germany and then Paris.
My first formal introduction to Soviet propaganda art was at London's Tate Modern where in the late 2000's they had an exhibit featuring great examples from that era. I was blown away by the intricacy of these pieces that were meant to inform, and ultimately model, a new society. Constructivism pushed using art for social purposes, a natural extension after the Russian revolution and the forming of the Soviet persona under Lenin. Art as a way to serve the political and cultural means of a country sounds completely counterintuitive to the art I think of now, which seems to be more countercultural than ever, pushing boundaries and holding governments to accountability.
One of my favorite examples is 1925's "Nowhere else but Mosselprom." It's almost an exercise in branding for a communist department store. Part of the appeal is the Russian alphabet and the otherworldly nature that it gives the composition. It's almost what you're used to, but not quite. I think this went a long way in shaping how Americans saw Russians. We didn't understand the letters in their language, immediately throwing their culture into a far off category.
The arrows point to the building in way that signifies 'this is the only place a true Russian would shop.' It's a powerful symbol. Also, notice the utilitarian design of the building, stark and made for a purpose that could easily change to a defensive stronghold at any moment. The use of red in the propaganda posters also made them stand out. The black and white backgrounds that usually accompanied the red accents played into the juxtaposition of the pieces. These weren't merely artworks, but advertisements from the government, not far off from a tweet from the White House today.
One thing that struck me was the inclusion of women in Soviet art. For a movement that was marked by macho-male figures, and still is to an extent, the female population was readily included in the worker's movement. In 1926's "Liberated woman – build up socialism!" you see a very strong portrayal of a female worker that contributed to society in the factories and fields alongside the men. This piece also highlights the use of red for declaring a message and black and white for the scene. The poster leaves what the women is holding in her hands a mystery. Is it a gun, broom or tool? That's up to the viewer, leaving room for any woman to see herself as part of the worker's movement.
For its part that it played in shaping how the common person saw the communist Soviet movement, it has to be hailed as one of the greatest ad campaigns ever executed. It rallied people behind a common cause and belief and allowed the government to use graphical representations to push its message. If that's not modern marketing, I'm not sure what is.
You can read more about Soviet design and propaganda art here.
